Ir al contenido

State of HTML 2023

[es-ES] general.back_to_intro

Accesibilidad

This was our first survey to study accessibility in such depth. What we found is that while respondents clearly care about accessibility, they struggle to implement it in practice as they lack technical, educational, and organizational support.

Funciones de accesibilidad

¿Cuáles de estas funciones de accesibilidad has utilizado?

Group by:

Sort by:

1

95.6%
3.2%
13,191
2

81.8%
11.5%
6.3%
13,164
3

11.8%
27.3%
60.6%
13,156
4

18.3%
79.6%
13,108

Experience

  • Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
  • Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
  • Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.

Sentiment

  • Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
  • Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
  • Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.

Discapacidades de los usuarios

¿Qué tipo de discapacidades tienen en cuenta los usuarios al crear sitios web?
0%
13%
26%
40%
53%
66%
1

low_vision

8,351
2

atypical_vision

6,671
3

mobility_impairments

3,504
4

vestibular_disorders

2,546
5

hearing_impairments

2,417
6

learning_disabilities

1,783
7

cognitive_impairments

1,552
8

None

3,088
0%
13%
26%
40%
53%
66%
% de respuestas respondidas
12,648
61%

Otras técnicas de accesibilidad

¿Qué otras técnicas forman parte de su estrategia habitual de accesibilidad?
0%
17%
35%
52%
69%
86%
1

descriptive_alt_text

11,219
2

headings_hierarchy

10,180
3

form_control_label

9,921
4

meaningful_link_text

8,709
5

good_color_contrast

8,023
6

Keyboard navigation

7,396
7

visible_focus

7,337
8

color_alternative

6,535
9

pointer_alternative

6,201
10

fieldset_and_legend

6,052
11

skip_to_content

4,396
12

3,676
13

1,341
14

None

654
0%
17%
35%
52%
69%
86%
% de respuestas respondidas
12,975
62%

Lectores de pantalla

¿Qué lectores de pantalla utiliza para las pruebas de accesibilidad?
0%
13%
26%
38%
51%
64%
1

VoiceOver

3,153
2

NVDA

1,501
3

JAWS

1,026
4

TalkBack

529
5

None

7,583
0%
13%
26%
38%
51%
64%
% de respuestas respondidas
11,819
57%

Herramientas de accesibilidad

¿Qué herramientas utiliza para las pruebas de accesibilidad?
0%
10%
20%
31%
41%
51%
1

Lighthouse

6,127
2

Axe

2,769
3

VoiceOver.js

206
4

Assistiv Labs

172
5

Guidepup

16
6

None

5,145
0%
10%
20%
31%
41%
51%
% de respuestas respondidas
12,004
57%

Puntos débiles de la accesibilidad

¿Cuáles son sus mayores dificultades en materia de accesibilidad web?
Freeform
0%
14%
28%
41%
55%
69%
1

Technical issues

Answers matching “Technical issues” 400
2

Company issues

Answers matching “Company issues” 251
3

Implementation issues

Answers matching “Implementation issues” 171
4

Screen reader issues

Answers matching “Screen reader issues” 143
5

Lack of best practices

6

Lack of tools

Answers matching “Lack of tools” 124
7

Lack of knowledge

8

Lack of documentation

9

Browser support

10

WCAG issues

Answers matching “WCAG issues” 44
0%
14%
28%
41%
55%
69%
% de respuestas respondidas
1,869
9%

Recursos recomendados

Web App Accessibility (feat. React)
Marcy Sutton Todd
Principle Studios

Web App Accessibility (feat. React)

Solve the most common accessibility issues in React apps using testing tools, semantic HTML, and ARIA attributes to make interactive elements accessible.
¡Gracias a nuestros socios por apoyarnos! Aprende más.